|
For these measurements the bandpass on the TS-2000 was set to
300 - 2800 Hz. The X axis scale on Visual Analyzer seen in Figure
3 is set to range 0 - 5000 Hz. The only criteria I used when
setting the Y axis was to allow for a modest centering of the
graph over a range of signal condition changes. Note: The graphs
display distortion figures THD and THD+N. I have not analyzed
the significance of those figures in this discussion.
The Kenwood TS-2000 is typical of most modern transceivers in
that it provides in addition to the normal speaker/phones audio
output which is controlled by the volume control, a line audio
out circuitry which is also adjustable but which is inedpendant
of the speaker/phones output. The line output level, once adjusted
remains independant of any changes made to the speaker/phones
output. The range of adjustment of the line output is in steps
1 through 9 with 1 being the lowest level.

Figure 3
I have the TS-2000 line output level set to Level 1 for the graph
seen in Figure 3. The peaks seen above the passband floor represent
PSK31 signals of varying strength. The rest is noise, both atmospheric
and internal receiver noise. If I increase the line out level
to the next higher increment, Level 2 as seen in Figure 4,
no significant difference is observed. The level of signal into
the sound card has increased as evidenced by the higher amplitude
of the passband.

Figure 4
There is a little more amplitude to the noise to the right side
of the trace between about 4.1 kHz and 5 kHz as the line output
level is increased. In this graph, it may seem of no consequence
and just looking at the two graphs, Figure 3 and Figure
4, it would be of no real significance. Differences in signals
seen within the passband and just the irregularity of noise could
cause seemingly random spikes. If there is cause to question the
presence of suspicious noise above the passband in frequency,
the next graph will confirm that the suspicion is warranted.

Figure 5
Figure 5 is with the line output level set to 4. The increase
in gain is obvious due to the further increased passband floor
amplitude. Now look at the noise outside of the passband. Even
when we're not dealing with overload caused harmonics showing
up in this area of the graph, the increased signal level gain
setting is resulting in an amplification of the noise which resides
in this area. It appears to me that this area which is higher
in frequency and outside of the set passband of the receiver is
also outside of the AGC loop. The level of noise on the floor
of the passband does not appear to vary with the increased level
setting suggesting that it is being "controlled" by
the AGC along with everything else within the passband.
Go to Home Page | Go
Back | Next, Too Much of a Good Thing
Like this page? Let
your friends know about it. Share
it through Facebook.
|
Still not able to find what you are looking
for?
Use this handy search tool to search the entire Web.
Questions? Comments? Contact
me
| Disclaimer:
I will not claim precise technical or scientific completeness
throughout this article. I have made every effort to present
the material and discussions here as accurately as my technical
expertise and understanding of the subject allows. I welcome
questions or comments which may further clarify or even correct
anything I have written here. |
|